In this article, we will delve into the reasons behind Luxembourg’s tax haven reputation and explore the various aspects that make it an attractive destination for tax optimization: tax policies, legal framework, and the benefits it offers to individuals and businesses seeking to minimize their tax exposure.
Luxembourg has earned a distinguished reputation as a tax haven due to its historical appeal to corporations and wealthy individuals since the 1960s. Rising as a prominent financial center for the offshore trade of European bonds, Luxembourg became a favored choice for entities seeking to issue deb.
Luxembourg is often said to be a tax haven. But what does that even mean and why has the Grand Duchy earned such an assessment? Tax havens commonly share certain characteristics, including:
Recent developments have seen Luxembourg undergo significant policy changes: abolishment of banking secrecy and the embrace of international cooperation through participation in the automatic exchange of information.
Luxembourg tax benefits offered to companies are a key aspect that has contributed extensively and continues to do so in attracting many companies. In the following sections, we will explore some of the specific measures designed to reduce tax burdens and create a favorable environment for entrepreneurial growth.
Luxembourg offers a progressive scale for corporate tax.
Total taxable income (euros) | Applicable rates |
≤ to 175,000 | Rate of 15% applicable to the total taxable income |
175,001 – 200,000 | Fixed amount of 26,250 euros plus a rate of 31% on the portion of the taxable income comprised between 175,000 and 200,000 euros. |
> to 200,000 | Rate of 17% applicable to the total taxable income |
This rate is increased by 7% in favor of the employment fund, and a municipal business tax (MBT) should also be added, the amount of which depends on the municipality and varies between 6.75% (applicable in the municipality of Luxembourg) and 10.5%.
The resulting effective interest rate would therefore be as shown in the table.
Corporate Income Tax (CIT) before increase for employment fund | 17% |
Employment fund markup | +1,19% |
MBT on taxable profits | +6,75% |
Effective rate of taxation | 24,94% |
Although the rate is attractive compared to other countries such as Germany, Italy, Malta, or Portugal, it is slightly higher than the European average, which stood at 20% in 2022.
This would seem contradictory as a rate slightly higher than the European average does not imply greater attractiveness for companies, however, given the considerable number of possible optimizations and tax benefits in Luxembourg, the actual rate may be considerably reduced.
The authors of OpenLux (a research paper on Luxembourg's status as a tax haven published in 2021) claim that the effective rate, given possible optimizations, could be as low as 1% or 2%.
The TVA rate in Luxembourg is divided into 4 parts and when compared to the rest of Europe, these are among the lowest.
Type of rate | Rate | Application field |
standard rate | 16% | all taxable operations except those included in any of the other categories. |
intermediate rate | 13% | custody and management of securities, printed advertising material, heat not provided by the heating network, and water distribution among others. |
reduced rate | 7% | gas, electricity, floriculture, hairdressing, and more. |
super-reduced rate | 3% | books, hotel accommodations, restaurants and non-alcoholic beverages, radio and television broadcasting services, and some others. |
Additionally, those with a turnover lower than 35,000 euros benefit from a VAT exemption.
The tax incentives offered by Luxembourg to businesses are a key aspect contributing to Luxembourg’s tax haven reputation. With a keen focus on attracting companies from various sectors, Luxembourg provides a range of enticing tax advantages that can significantly benefit businesses. We will take an overview of some of them.
Not only companies but also citizens receive tax preferences.
Luxembourg has been for a long time a favored choice for entities thanks to its advantageous tax incentives that enable substantial reductions in tax obligations. In the following section, we will see how Luxembourg has changed its policy, and examine the current outlook.
Historically, the Luxembourg state seems to have wanted to maintain a dual position: on the one hand, it has long defended banking secrecy, but on the other hand, it has wanted to avoid being classified as a banking haven.
For a long time, the European Union has been fighting to get Luxembourg to renounce banking secrecy and accept automatic exchanges of information.
In 2008, the pressure on Luxembourg intensified with the economic crisis and a changing global context. In addition to the debate on banking secrecy within a framework of tax harmonization between the various member states, there was a more pressing need to maximize tax revenues in states sorely tested by a financial crisis immediately followed by a general economic slowdown.
Added to this pressure from the European Union was pressure from international and multilateral organizations such as the OECD and the G20, which in early 2009 threatened to put tax havens on a blacklist.
All these pressures quickly showed the limits of Luxembourg's resistance, and just before the G20, Liechtenstein, Andorra, Belgium, Switzerland, and Luxembourg announced almost simultaneously their intention to comply with OECD standards to avoid being blacklisted.
In October 2023, Luxembourg signed the agreements to end banking secrecy and participate in the automatic and mandatory exchange of financial information between tax administrations from 2017.
Additionally, with the LuxLeaks financial scandal coming to light in November 2014, Luxembourg, wanting to show its good intentions and political change, quickly declared its intention to participate actively in the OECD's base erosion and profit-shifting negotiations, the aim of which is to establish greater tax fairness worldwide.
While Luxembourg has made notable strides in its efforts to combat tax evasion and enhance transparency, it still has a long way to go before shedding its tax haven reputation. Significant policy changes, such as the elimination of banking secrecy and participation in the automatic exchange of information, demonstrate positive steps taken by the country. However, it is important to acknowledge that Luxembourg continues to maintain a high level of financial secrecy.
According to the Financial Privacy Index calculated by Tax Justice Network, Luxembourg scores 55 out of 100, indicating a considerable level of financial secrecy.
This index takes into account a country's laws regarding financial secrecy and the extent of its financial services provided to residents of other countries. It is worth noting that the index does not capture the full extent of undeclared capital that may be present due to the significant volume of financial activity.
The OpenLux investigation, conducted by Le Monde and sixteen other newspapers and published in February 2021, shed light on Luxembourg's characteristics as a tax haven. It revealed how multinational companies and billionaires engage in business with Luxembourg to avoid taxes through the use of shell companies.
Oxfam France, a leading organization advocating against inequality and poverty, emphasized that the investigation exposed the exploitation of loopholes in the economic system by billionaires and large corporations. They criticized the European Union for its failure to include Luxembourg on its tax haven blacklist, as well as other European tax havens.
Oxfam France believes that the European Union should update its tax haven blacklist and strengthen the criteria to include countries with a zero corporate tax rate.
In Luxembourg, despite the official corporate tax rate of 24.95%, various optimizations can significantly reduce the effective tax rate to as low as 1% or 2%, as highlighted in the OpenLux investigation.
And it is worth mentioning the extent and severity of the problem, according to estimates by economists in 2018, as much as 80% of the profits that are moved across the EU end up in tax havens located in Luxembourg, Ireland, and the Netherlands.
Considering these factors, several organizations such as Oxfam France maintain its stance that Luxembourg still functions as a tax haven. While efforts have been made to address the issue, further measures and international cooperation are necessary to ensure greater transparency and fairness in the country's taxation system.
The OpenLux research that we mentioned previously allows us to see the Luxembourg reality to some extent and to have a look at some examples. According to this research, almost half of the commercial companies registered in the country are pure financial holding companies with no less than 6,500 billion euros in assets.
Le Monde calculated that twenty-nine of the thirty-seven CAC 40 groups based in France are also present in Luxembourg through at least 166 subsidiaries. Some of these companies are Dassault, Michelin, Sanofi, Danone, LVMH, L'Oréal or Chanel.
The problem lies in the fact that, although some of them correspond to actual operations on Luxembourg soil such as the Sephora store in Luxembourg City (LVMH), three-quarters of these subsidiaries essentially serve financial interests. Some have a small office in Luxembourg with a few employees and others are content with a simple mailbox in a domiciliation office. Their Luxembourg roots are sometimes reduced to a single annual board meeting organized locally, with a handful of chartered accountants appointed as “administrators” to handle the accounts and administrative formalities. Some of these companies simply act as intermediaries for the Group's subsidiaries in other countries.
These subsidiaries whose interest is purely financial are mostly present in the Grand Duchy for tax optimization reasons. Although this practice is legal, provided that the rules and regulations are respected, the extent of its application in Luxembourg shows the ease and advantages that the country offers to companies to avoid the taxation to which they should be subject in their home countries if they had not resorted to Luxembourg subsidiaries. Luxembourg offers a multitude of devices that allow to meet this objective, for example, in France, you have to pay 3% tax when you sell a subsidiary and 0% in Luxembourg which in terms of millions of euros is a big difference.
An illustration of this situation is a report by the European Parliament which in 2020 singled out the Grand Duchy for its practices that facilitate tax evasion. Based on multiple rankings, this report shows that Luxembourg is among the countries most likely to encourage tax evasion and money laundering. It is accompanied by Switzerland, the Netherlands, Panama, Hong Kong and the Cayman Islands, among others.
Source: lemonde.fr, cairn.info, touteleurope.eu, pfi.public.lu, guichet.public.lu, lu.andersen.com, lettredesreseaux.com
We took photos from these sources: Cedric Letsch for Unsplash, Kelly Sikkema for Unsplash